Smokes and Mirrors – What’s Up With Tobacco Taxes?

All across the the Granite State Democrats have gathered in their secret underground lairs.  The unthinkable has happened.  Tobacco revenues were up last month.   (Audible Gasp!).  That’s right.  Revenues beat estimates.

This is, of course, a double edged sword for the liberal left.   When their grotesque estimates (overall) were forever coming in under target, how many times did they say, “it’s just one month, wait and see.  Give it time, they’ll come around.  We’re not that far off.” No such quarter for Republicans. ( Typical hypocrats.)   At the ugly end of the 2007 to 2010 Democrat “experiment” they were off by about a billion dollars which might suggest they have no clue what they are doing.

But when the Republican’s estimated revenues for their budget the Democrats cried and whined anyway as if they were suddenly experts; the religious left even gathered to pray for more spending.  I’m not kidding.  They prayed for more spending.  The left claimed repeatedly that Republican estimates were purposefully low to punish people.  That is what the left said.

But the overall estimates are close.  Very close.  This means the Democrats were wrong about Republicans underestimating revenue on purpose, which means they were themselves wrong about estimates again (no surprise there).  With revenue nearly in line with spending, bitching about it makes them look petty and just reminds everyone what wretched stewards they were of our tax dollars.

So left hanging without an economic axe to grind they have bet their rhetorical money on the cigarette tax cut.  But they may have lost that bet as well.

In February tobacco revenue was reported to be $900,000.00 over projections.  In April, it was above projection by close to a million.  (That’s $1,000,000.00).  In between tobacco revenues were down.  Lottery, gaming, liquor and beer, over the entire budget cycle, are all below protections.  Sales on all these items are down across the board.  It’s not just tobacco.  The message from the secret lair however is that the tobacco tax cut was irresponsible, but given the economic climate (created by Democrats, by the way), and the poor overall performance in the sin tax sector, tobacco revenue is actually doing fairly well.

Would the Democrats like to now argue that cheaper cigarettes are costing us tax revenue in beer, liquor, lottery and gambling receipts?

“Yes, we see a pattern where, during these economically depressed times, people are flocking to higher tax states to get as little for their dwindling dollars as they can.”

How about “they are doing what people always do when they have less money”–doing with less.  Oh, sorry.  We’re talking to Democrats.  When they have less they always spend more, or tax more, and then more, and more, and more.   But outside the liberal ghetto of the left wing mind real people have to make sacrifices and driving to New Hampshire to save a few bucks might not be cost effective right now.  Why?  How about gas prices?   Perhaps our current energy policy and a weak dollar have made the cost of traveling to and from New Hampshire to save a few bucks untenable.  (See, I told you we should have lowered the gas tax.)

Let me save you some time.  Democrats don’t care.  They’ve got talking points to talk about.  Dwindling tobacco taxes are killing unwed mothers and fatherless children and old people with brain disorders.  No answers, no past experience to run on, just scare tactics.

When was the last time a New Hampshire Democrat lowered a tax or spent less on government?  How about never.  To a Democrat balancing spending with revenue is the equivalent of fiscal hate speech.  Government can never get smaller, those bureaucrats and their unions finance their campaigns and vote for them.  They need that money and those votes, so screw you.  And for four years they did.  Hard.  And no amount of Tobacco taxes (which they raised several times) would have ever covered up the gross fiction of left wing revenue estimation, a felonious event they continue to perpetrate even when out of power.

But undeniable truths will not be silenced. Democrats were wrong about revenue estimates when they were in power,  Governor Lynch was wrong as usual with his budget, and if the Democrats were still in power now they’d be wrong to the tune of a few hundred million more, heaped onto the backs of people who clearly do not have extra money for liquor, beer and cigarettes, and would have even less under the yoke of the Democrats ever rising tax burden and grow government first agenda.

New Hampshire Republicans took a very bold and responsible approach to the budget, one that people are clamoring to see in Washington.   They provided relief on a dead end tax that disproportionally hits lower income earners but at least presents an opportunity to stimulate other forms of commerce, something no tax increase will ever do.  The Republicans estimated revenues in a way that avoided putting additional state tax pressures on small businesses and struggling citizens, while removing others.  And then only spent what they thought they’d have.  So far that’s worked out pretty well, and Democrats hate that.

We cant overcome the Democrats failed economic policy and disastrous energy policy agenda overnight.  New Hampshire can’t drill for its own oil.  So we have to do the best we can until we can do better.  And we are doing better.  And Democrats hate that.

And while the progressives would like to see gas prices come down for their buddy Obama, odds are very good that this price signal could encourage people from outside the state to use those savings to save even more on cross border sales of cigarette’s, beer, liquor, and lottery tickets, and Democrats don’t want to see Republicans proved right.

If the tobacco revenues eventually come it at or above projection, at the end of this fiscal experiment, all the left will have left is that $72,000.00  dollar taxpayer funded luxury remodel of the bathroom next to former Democrat House speaker Terie Norelli’s office (in the middle of the worst recession in history™ ), and another chapter in New Hampshire politics where they were completely wrong about the budget–again!

Let the New Hampshire Democrats scream at the darkness.  Everyone else, feel free to ask for a light.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Complete Gaia Comment Stream

New Hampshire Public Employee Gaia managed to read, consume, and then comment at the Concord Monitor’s web site some 1200 times in just three years, more often than not during office hours. (Just to clarify this last point, a super majority of time during office hours.)

We could guess that they were doing it during one of their “breaks.”  We know that DES has a very forgiving break policy so perhaps the whole of the bureaucracy is as forgiving?  But then why did Gaia stop commenting all together after we announced our investigation into who they are?

(For those unfamilair, Gaiais the handle of the second State Employee we found spending their work day online, commenting at the Concord Monitor.  The first was SEIU Chapter VP, and DES employee Dick de Seve.  Ed Naile, myself, and Skip Murphy are in the midst of a series of RTK’s to discover the depth and width of his abuse and internet abuse in general among public employees.)

As to who Gaia is, we are narrowing down the search, and we’ll let you know when we’ve got that figured out.  (We are very close.)  In the mean time, here are the links to the Scribd posting of both PDF’s which include all 1200 Gaia comments at the Concord Monitor.  Links to browser versions will be available at GraniteGrok, in the next day or so.

Please feel free to crowd source this.  We have also posted the comment stream of Dick de Seve, which is available in its entirty over at the Grok.


If you would like to report a Public Employee Behaving Badly, email us at grokwatch@granitegrok.com

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

A New Front in The War on Women – Do Liberal Chicks Dig Polygamy?

Piggy-backing off of Tim’s post on Mark Steyn’s recent article, I think the polygamy thing (which Tim does not mention) is worth visiting–repeatedly of course–just to remind everyone of the kind of campaign this has been and will continue to be.  Nothing coming from the Obama side will be relevant or substantive, everything utter nonsense.  And nonsense with the same lack of sourcing on the Democrat side as we’ve seen in everything they do.

For their next exploding cigar, the Democrats chose polygamy. Brian Schweitzer, the Democrat governor of Montana, remarked that Romney was unlikely to appeal to women because his father was “born on a polygamy commune.” Eighty-six percent of women, noted Gov. Schweitzer with a keenly forensic demographic eye, are “not great fans of polygamy.” You can understand the 86 percent’s ickiness at the whole freaky-weirdy idea of a president descended from someone who had multiple wives. Eww.

Just for the record, Romney’s father was not a polygamist; Romney’s grandfather was not a polygamist; his great-grandfather was a polygamist. Miles Park Romney died in 1904, so one can see why this would weigh heavy on 86 percent of female voters 108 years later.

Meanwhile, back in the female-friendly party, Obama’s father was a polygamist; his grandfather was a polygamist; and his great-grandfather was a polygamist who had one more wife (five in total) than Romney’s great-grandfather. It seems President Obama is the first male in his line not to be a polygamist. So, given the “gender gap,” maybe those 86 percent of American women are way cooler with polygamy than Gov. Schweitzer thinks. Maybe these liberal chicks really dig it.
Another first for Barack Obama.  Too bad about the polygamy narrative though.  I imagine that could have had a lot of legs.

Which leads me to the next obvious question.  Could federally funded contraception users redefine polygamy to mean multiple partners instead of just multiple wives?  Or how about married men who cheat on their wives?  That would make Bill Clinton and John Edwards Polygamists–mighty good company if you are the average modern day Democrat.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Concord Monitor Wont Cover it, But They’ll help Cover It up.

Concord Monitor is deleting comments to stories about people who comment there on taxpayer time
There is Free Press and then there is Free Speech.  And then there is The Concord Monitor.  The Concord Monitor would like you to believe that it is a defender of both Free Press and Free Speech.   But if that were true, they would not be deleting comments that include links to posts at GraniteGrok.  Articles that implicate State employees (known and unknown) in the abuse of their taxpayer funded privileges.  Abuses that occurred on the Concord Monitor’s own web site.

Now, to be fair, it is not technically the Concord Monitors job to police the misbehavior of others who otherwise abide by the rules of their electronic presence; though given most of their editorial positions one would think them obsessed with the idea of meddling, and you would be right to be curious about why it fails to apply here?  You’d also be right to wonder why the Monitor staff would both ignore stories about a potential theft of services by state employees themsleves and also delete comments linking to a New Media investigation of same?

You’d think they were hiding something.

It certainly would not be their bias.

So what’s the excuse for removing comments with links to legitimate reporting that brings more depth to their pages, that they didn’t even have to pay for?  We didn’t put a pay or subscription wall up at Granite Grok.   So what’s the problem?  Where are these so-called defenders of Free Speech and Free Press when it is inconvenient to their obvious bias?


Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Remembering Democrat Rule In New Hampshire – Part 1

 

New Hampshire Democrats treated your money like toilet paper
In the 2006 Elections Democrats took control of the New Hampshire House for the first time in 95 years (giving them complete control of State government for what would end up being four years).  What happened after that must not be forgotten, for it is the doom of men that they forget.

 

They forget that the House Democrats first move was to turn budget policy on its head.  Instead of estimating realistic revenues so that the governor could have a guideline for his budget, they would let the governor request a 14% expansion of state government in February of 2007, to which they would pad or add their spending spree agenda items before figuring out how to tax New Hampshire citizens to pay for their wish list.

 

In the now infamous shout heard round the State House, Democrat House leader Dan Eaton would later condense the entire four year budget strategy of the New Hampshire left into one sentence.
 ’It makes sense to know how much you’re spending before you decide how much money to raise.’
Now that might just make sense for a school trip or new band uniforms but this wasn’t a fundraiser.  Eaton was talking about using the force of law and the power of the state to extract juice from the fruits of other peoples labors based on the whimsy of big government legislators with little or no regard for its affect on the state, our economy, or the people who would be paying, and that was exactly how the Democrats would govern.

 

Spot the Hypocrisy?

The current Democrat narrative is one of a Republican Legislature with skewed priorities out to hurt the most vulnerable, an agenda to which they themselves could easily relate because in March of 2007 the new Democrat Majority, in the midst of their out of the gate 2007 spending spree, found time to preserve barns, buy a Mountain, and expand the bureaucracy, but voted down a floor amendment that would have fully funded and completely eliminated, the developmental disabilities waiting list during their first biennium.  In the same month the Democrat controlled Senate bulldozed SB 186, a bill to provide a property tax credit for senior citizens, down to study committee that was then killed in the Democrat controlled NH House.
So despite the New Hampshire Democrats complete control of state government and an unhealthy and unrealistic desire to spend (spend spend), instead of using that opportunity to live up to their rhetoric (to help some of the state’s most vulnerable) they kill bills to help those people and pass a bill that would allow the Democrat party to profit from the sale of the state’s voter list.
And this was just the beginning of tax and spend era of a Democrat party I would promptly dub Hypocrats.

 

The new Democrat majority had already raised the cigarette tax 35%, increased some annual vehicle registration fees by 20%, added a new ‘real estate tax’ that would screw new home buyers out of $40.00 per recorded page of deed mortgages, and decided that we needed a new $30.00 Scratch ticket without having held a single hearing; there was a luxury sale and use tax on the docket, a payroll tax, an inheritance tax. Taken along with their decision to calculate revenue after the Governor wrote a wish-list budget, the new era of spending and debt, only three months old, was just the beginning of a long and unpleasant four year journey down the toilet.  A journey we are going to walk you through right here, all summer long.

 

By the way… did you know that the Republican House recently passed 267-12, a measure to add money to the Rainy Day fund the Democrats had drained while also voting to send 1.5 Million to shorten the waiting list for New Hampshire citizens with developmental disabilities.  Yeah, the same waiting list of citizens the Democrats screwed back in 2007.

 

 

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Dover NH GSPLPAC Tea Party- Live streaming

Follow the link to see the Dover NH Granite State Patriots Liberty PAC Tea Party.

http://granitegrok.com/blog/2012/04/gslpac-tea-party-event-live-streaming

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

HB 1607 – Public Schools Could See Buckets of Free Money?

Skip just posted a nice letter at GraniteGrok from the Londonderry Superintendent of schools, in which the Super appears to lobby the state Senate in opposition to NH HB1607.  This bill establishes an education tax credit for businesses or groups that set up scholarship programs to help offset the costs of non-public school tuition.  This could allow more parents to enroll their kids outside of the governments education monopoly and on paper at least take the paltry sum of $3,450.00 per student with them when the business is reimbursed for its donations with a tax credit of that amount.   The business is, of course, free to set it’s award at any sum above that at their discretion, but the credit is (I assume) maxed out at $3450.00 per student.

Needless to say, the Super (Nate Greenberg) doesn’t care for the bill.  By his calculation each school district will lose money it needs to teach students and would necessarily downshift those costs onto local property taxpayers to make up the difference.

That argument sounds like it might hold water–the entire lobbying question Skip raises aside–but only if taken in the vacuum of the space between the typical bureaucrats ears.  I wont revisit all the Super’s arguments here, just follow the link if you feel confused, but in my district, this bill would, on paper at least,  be like the school district finding a winning lottery ticket every single year.

In Merrimack the actual ‘on-paper’ cost per student is well over $14,000.00 each.; total enrollment of 4700 (ish) divided by our roughly 65+ million dollar school budget.  If a parent can only take $3,450.00 per child, then the town is still getting paid $11,000.00 dollar per child with no child left to teach.
To see how that looks if we borrow the formula the Super’s letter

COPUPPSE (Cost of Over-priced Under Performing Public School Education) -  PTPR (Pittance of Tuition Parent Receives) = JPSS  (Jackpot for Public School System)
In my case, using the 5 fewer students per grade level model, including kindergarten, that would net the district an extra  $700,000.00 per year in revenue for which there are no “students” to spend it on.  Free money?

So the problem won’t be downshifting costs on taxpayers,  it will be a Super and a School Board explaining why the district still needs more than $11,000.00 dollars per non-existent student not to educate those non- students that do not exist.   $700,000.00 – 0 = $700,000.00.

And having made that argument successfully, should we expect that as a line item in all future school budgets regardless of the outcome of HB 1607?  “We’d like to add a million to the school budget for not educating roughly 90 non-students, in the next fiscal year.”

HB1607 is like free money, unless of course the taxpayers want to have a discussion about why it costs so damn much to send a kid to public school.  That might be a problem worth the Super’s time.

So Quit your bitching.

by Steve MacDonald

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized